Contact and Corrections

NCPRN Review handles correspondence in writing only. There is no telephone line, no office address and no contact form on this site, because we are a small independent publication and we prefer a clear written record for every request.

We welcome two kinds of message: corrections and substantive questions about method.

If you are requesting a correction, please include the following, so the request can be assessed without a second exchange:

1. The exact article title as it appears on the page.
2. The full URL of the article.
3. The passage you believe is wrong, quoted word for word.
4. What you believe the accurate position to be.
5. The evidence that supports your position. Public sources are preferred. Please give a link or a full citation, and note the date you consulted it.
6. Whether you have any direct connection to the name, domain or organisation discussed. This does not disqualify a request, but we need to know it.

Requests that do not identify the article and supply evidence cannot be acted on. We do not make changes on assertion alone, and we do not remove accurate material because it is unwelcome.

Where a correction is made, the article is amended and the change is noted rather than silently applied. Where a request is declined, we will say why.

Questions about method, sourcing or scope are also welcome. We answer what we can, in the order received, and we do not promise a response time.